Homies:
Squid
JHKrpg
Minnie
Oblomovka
Yoohoo et al
Warrior Goddess
Yatima
Mama Pajama
Jo Spanglemonkey
Grace
Quilter
whump
Up for the Down Stroke
Brooklyn Days
elswhere
jennyalice
Riverbend
LJ friends

Kicking ass:
brokenclay
Wheelchair Dancer
Screw Bronze!
A Different Light
Chewing the Fat
Gimp Parade
Crip Power
Wheelie Catholic
Wheel World
Disability Studies blog
Wheelchair Diffusion

Favorites:
Pandagon
Bitch, Ph.D.
Angry Black Bitch
Feministe
This Is Zimbabwe
Arbusto de Mendacity
Brutal Women
Twisty
Body Impolitic
Mommybloggers
I, Asshole
Strip Mining for Whimsy
Zellar
Banubula
Random Redhead
Caracas Chronicles
El Universal
Venezuelanaylsis
The Loom
Pharyngula

More homies:
Claire Light
Sammest
Too Beautiful
Blogosity
Barak
Prentiss
NakedJen
Susie Bright
Tallie
Just Kristin
Brian
Mer
Realgurl
hjem
Not Calm Dot Com
Owlmonkey
Zombiegrrrl
KRON

More of my projects:
J. de Ibar.
Les Guérillères
Bookmania
Canadian beaver trade
Slut Manifesto
everything2 stuff
Cat Mustaches

More great stuff:
United Spinal Association
Disabilty Culture Watch
Green Fairy
Apophenia
Napsterization
BlogHer
Misbehaving Women
Broad Universe
Carl Brandon Society
Tiptree award
Locus
Words Without Borders
Center for the Art of Translation
Palabra Virtual
Poesía Diaria

Spanish dictionaries:
Google Language Tools
Yahoo spanish dictionary
DRAE
Onelook

stats



  • View My Stats

« Filling out job apps; grades | Main | Trivial annoyance »

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

qp

We were just talking about him the other day! apparently he alluded to a speech Lincoln made, about the times requiring him to run, though he wouldn't otherwise... except that Lincoln was totally scheming and climbing the whole time, so it's not a very good speech to allude to.
and what could we possibly need him for!!

shrike

Just for this comment I will be sending another donation to the ACLU, Newt.

Crawl in a hole and die, you Bush fascists.....

toobeaut

 
before we actually lose a city, which I think could happen in the next decade

But failing that, I'm sure he has a few cities in mind the Republicans wouldn't mind disappearing off the face of the earth.

toobeaut

BTW, here's a transcript from the May 14, 2006 "Meet the Press" in whcih Gingrich said something similar:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12739318/

GINGRICH: Look, if you find out one morning that we now have five terrorists in the U.S. who are part of an active network who want to destroy New York City or Buffalo or Atlanta, and the government says, "You know, we could've tracked every call they made for the last 10 years, but that would've been wrong, Tim. So we don't know who they've been working with. We don't know what their network is and we can't stop it," you're then going to have a totally new set of congressional hearings by the same people who will then reverse their side, totally. I do think your civil liberties ought to be...(unintelligible). Nobody who's not involved in terrorism should be at risk. Nobody who's making normal phone calls should be at risk. But the idea that we're going to say to the United States government, for libertarian reasons, "We'd rather lose a city than have you gather data," I think is totally out of touch with the danger of the modern world.

 
Nice quote there: "I do think your civil liberties ought to be...(unintelligible)."

Mark Jones

Newt Gingrich? They say 60 is the new 40. I say psychopathic is the new sanity.As an ex-republican/former democrat. All I have to say is "What the fuck?" Is this the best the republicans have to offer? Perhaps Rudy or Mc Cain would better serve we moral types.Or,maybe Mitt Romney who belongs to a religion that in some small circles espouses bigamy/polygamy. Not only do I believe that the unholy veil has finally been lifted from these bastards. I believe that their misguided agenda is more apparently coming to light.And that would be that Iran was always the BIG ENCHILADA in the middle. Please notice the increase in Army recruitment ads.Please notice the increase in documentaries concerning Iran.Please notice the documentaries regarding new types of weapons that we intend to use. Cool huh? Do you see a pattern developing here? But, the bigger picture is "Why are we owned by the RED CHINESE?" Because, when the bombs fly and the dust settles, and all the the t-bonds are accounted for.Who really wins in the end? Why do I seem to equate the republican party with China?Could it be the Nixon administration normalizing relations? Could it be Reagan,Bush #1 granting most favored nation status to a decidedly oppressive communist regime even in light of Tiananmen Square? My opinion.You decide.

The comments to this entry are closed.