This makes my brain hurt: about The Jargon of Authenticity. I never remember what "ontological" means, for fuck's sake. Heidegger. I used to enjoy randomly browsing "poetry language thought" but it's damned unlikely I'm going to buckle down and understand this. But somewhere in there it is a good stretchy-hurt like I am getting some vague new ideas. Forcing myself into logic might just be a waste of a good brain. Logic shmogic (sorry J.)
Maybe I should stick to the shiny, candy-like goodness of "In 1926" for my sources on authenticity.
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.